Apocalypse Wow! (Part 10)
May 19th, 2012 |Now we come to the Lord’s address to the church at Philadelphia (Revelation 3:7-13). The name Philadelphia means brotherly love in Greek. Again, this church does not represent the faithful church of the last days, inasmuch as there is no internal evidence in the Apocalypse that would even suggest that the seven churches represent successive stages of church history.
In this address, unlike the previous ones, Jesus is not described using imagery from His appearance to John in ch. 1. He is called the faithful, the true, the one having the key of David, who opens and no one shuts, and shuts and no one opens. This description clearly speaks of the Lord’s right to rule and to delegate his power to whom He wills. The expression Key of David comes from Isaiah 22:22: And the key of the house of David I will lay upon his shoulder; so he shall open and no one shall shut; and he shall shut and no one shall open.
After the conquest of Canaan the Israelites were ruled by a series of Judges, the last of which being the prophet Samuel. When Samuel was old and ready to pass on, the Jews did not want his two godless sons to rule them, so they asked for a king. The first king of Israel was Saul, but he was replaced by David of Bethlehem, the son of Jesse, of the tribe of Judah. From that point on until Zedekiah, the last of the Old Testament kings, was taken into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar about 600 BC, all the kings of Israel were direct descendants of David. After Zedekiah the next and final Davidic king would be the Messiah, as predicted in the Isaiah passage. Jesus description in Revelation 3:7 speaks of His right to rule over Israel as the predicted Messiah.
Don’t you wonder why the Lord would use this Old Testament designation to describe Himself to an audience that is primarily gentile? Isaiah 22:22 speaks of Christ as the king of Israel. But in 3:9 esus refers to the Jews in Philadelphia as the synagogue of Satan. In fact He says their claim to be Jews is in name only, and that they are not really Jews but liars. Then He predicts that they will one day come and bow before the gentile believers. We might be able to dismiss these words, except that the Lord uses nearly identical language in 2:9 to describe the Jews in Smyrna. Add to that the fact that John had referred to the gentile recipients of the Apocalypse as kings and priests (1:6). What are we to make of this?
If you have been raised in a typical evangelical church in America you have likely been taught that God has two peoples: a heavenly people (the church) and an earthly people (Israel). God’s plans for these two peoples is distinct–they do not overlap. According to this view Jesus came to earth and offered Israel an earthly kingdom, which they rejected. When they did this the prophetic time clock for Israel stopped at the end of the 69th week of Daniel’s prophecy of the 70 weeks (Daniel 9:24-27). The present church age is a parenthesis in God’s program for Israel. God is presently saving people and bringing them into the body of Christ, but eventually the the present church age will conclude with the secret pretribulational rapture of the church, and then the suspended program for Israel will resume during the 70th week, the great tribulation. The prophetic time clock which stopped over 2,000 years ago, will start ticking again and God will be dealing with the Jews as a nation. They will rebuild their temple and the sacrificial system will resume straight through into the 1,000-year reign of Christ on earth (millennium).
But the New Testament does not teach that God has two separate peoples. First, Paul tells us that they are not all Israel who are of Israel (Romans 9:6). In other words, physical birth into a nation does not make a person one of God’s people, but rather spiritual birth, or regeneration. Within the nation was a remnant of saved sinners, and these were the true Israel. They were saved by their trust in the anticipated Messiah and His mediatorial work. They were looking forward to the cross through the sacrifices of the Levitical system. When the nation rejected Christ God continued to save a people for His name, only now they were looking back at the completed work of Christ. When His own kinsmen rejected Him He saved as many as received Him by believing in His name (John 1:12-13). Right after Pentecost mostly Jews were saved, but eventually the gentile believers were grafted in–not to a separate tree, but to the same one as the Jewish believers of the Old Testament!
Now you can see why Jesus told the Jews of Smyrna and Philadelphia that they were not really Jews. They are the synagogue of Satan because they have rejected Christ. The church is the true circumcision (Philippians 3:3), the true Israel of God (Galatians 6:16). Jesus now rules through His church. The church is now God’s holy nation, royal priesthood, and special people (1 Peter 2:9-10). This was the view of the post-apostolic and Reformation churches. The Jews rejected Christ and their house was left to them desolate with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Has anything changed since then with respect to Israel’s acceptance of Christ? What has changed is that in 1830 the two-people-of God system known as dispensationalism came into being. But as you can see, Jesus is not a dispy.
Does this mean there is no future for the nation Israel? The New Testament does predict that one day all Israel will be saved (Romans 11:26). But when this happens it will happen just like it does for the elect of any other ethnicity–they will trust Jesus and become members of the body of Christ or be lost! They will be grafted into the same tree spiritually as you and me. They will not be saved in some different way or be Old Testament saints (whatever that means). They might build a new temple in Jerusalem, but if they do it will not be because God has commanded them to do so or because scripture predicts it. Nor will God instruct them to re-institute the Levitical sacrifices when the book of Hebrews tells us they have been forever abolished by Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice on the cross (Hebrews 10:10-14).
What then should our attitude be as believers toward Israel? We need to respect Israel for the noble role she has played in redemption history. Personally I would like to see our government protect them from the persecution they suffer from the Arab nations. But we must bear in mind that even when God was working through them exclusively (which He is not now) and the Mosaic Covenant was in effect (which it is not now), Israel was not entitled to possession of the Land when they were disobedient to the Lord. This means that since they are in rebellion against Christ they have no more claim to the borders of Israel than the Palestinians. Personally I hope they can gain possession of it, but not if it causes them to continue in their stiff-necked rejection of the Lord.
We as members of Christ’s body can take encouragement in the fact that He is King of Kings now. He need not wait until some mythological future Jewish millennium. He reigns through His chosen people the church. He tells the believers at Philadelphia that He has placed before them an open door that no one can close (v. 8). This is the door of opportunity to submit to Christ’s rule through us in this world. No human form of rule or authority, not even the emperor of Rome or the persecuting Jews, could thwart the rule of Christ through His people. Ours is the privilege of serving as His ambassadors in this world. I am sad to say that I have not availed myself of this great opportunity as I could or should.
These promises are given to the Philadelphian believers with the assurance that Christ will protect them in the midst of trial and persecution: Because you have kept the word of my patience, I also will keep you from the hour of testing which is about to come upon the inhabited world, to test those who dwell upon the earth (3:10). I have heard many say that this verse is the clearest evidence of a pretribulational rapture to be found in scripture. All I can say is that if this is the best you’ve got you are on thin ice.
The argument goes like this. The church at Philadelphia represents the faithful church of the last days. The hour of trial mentioned is the Great Tribulation, or the 70th week of Daniel yet future. Jesus promises the church at Philadelphia that He will keep them from this hour of trial. What clearer evidence for a pre-trib rapture could there be?
First, the concept of Philadelphia as the faithful church of the last days is without support. Second, there is no mention of Daniel’s 70th week or reference to the so-called Great Tribulation. Third, there is no reference whatever to a resurrection or rapture in the text. When Jesus promises to keep them from the hour of trial he uses the same Greek words (tereo ek) as in His prayer in John 17:15: I do not pray that you should take them out of the world, but that you should keep them from (tereo ek) the evil one.So the idea in both places is not of spatial removal from the world but protection in the midst of trial. Jesus said that in the world we will have tribulation. Paul said that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.
I find this to be very encouraging. God promised the believers in Philadelphia that His reign in and through them was like an open door that no amount of affliction or persecution could close. They might suffer physical harm but through it all He would keep them in His hand. On the other hand I truly fear for those believers who have become comfortable in the pew and are banking on Jesus to rapture them out before they suffer the smallest scratch. A time of genuine persecution and affliction may well leave many believers disillusioned, and some might apostatize from the faith under the pressure, having been spoon-fed the pabulum of Tim LaHaye and Hal Lindsey.
Notice in v. 11 Jesus says He is coming quickly. This is the same word John used in 1:1 to describe things that would shortly take place. Whatever the meaning here it cannot refer to something two thousand years in the future from the perspective of the first recipients. As I said in an earlier entry, not every coming of Jesus mentioned in the word of God is a reference to his bodily second coming. Here it could mean a visitation of judgment of some kind. In any event the Lord encourages them to stand fast and make sure no one robs them of their crown. Here as before the reference is to the victor’s garland given to those who faithfully persevere in time of trial.
Being made a pillar in the temple of God and having the name of the New Jerusalem engraved on one’s person (v. 12) speaks of permanency. He shall not go out again. In case you hadn’t noticed, very little in this world is certain or lasting. The grass withers and the flower fades, but He who does the will of God abides forever. I hope you are encouraged and motivated by these truths. We are God’s chosen people. We are His holy nation, His royal priesthood. We share in His reign now. Tribulation will come, but the forces of hell cannot shut what He opens. What a great blessing to be a part of His sovereign plan through our union with Christ.
Recent Comments
Great,now I don't know what I believe about the end times. I...
Thanks for your thoughtful responses. Yes, we are fallibl...
you clarified your contested point in the last message here....
pete: I must give you my virtual handshake, even though...
I remember Gussie's store, she had a great ministry. Good m...